Drawing for EPBMC

USPTO serial 76661151

EPBMC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPBMC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D. Benjamin Borson

D BENJAMIN BORSON BORSON LAW GROUP PC1320 WILLOW PASS RD STE 490CONCORD, CA 94520UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009LABORATORY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, SPECTROSCOPES FOR IMMUNOLOGICAL DETECTION OF BIOLOGICAL MATERIALSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 13, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Mar 13, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 13, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 5, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 2, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 2, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 1, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 1, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 5, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 28, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 25, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 30, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 30, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Mar 30, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Mar 2, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 1, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 2, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Dec 7, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 17, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance