USPTO serial 76661605
PIGLET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PIGLET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Shaurette
James D. Shaurette Wells Street John P.S.601 W. First Avenue, Suite 1300Spokane, WA 99201-3828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SECURITY AND ALARM SYSTEMS COMPRISING, ALARMS UTILIZING LOCKS AND CABLES TO SECURE GOODS, AND REMOTE TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS WHICH TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE THE ALARM BETWEEN REMOTE LOCATIONS; SECURITY AND ALARM SYSTEMS COMPRISING, ALARMS UTILIZING LOCKS AND CABLES TO SECURE INGRESS OR EGRESS TO DESIGNATED AREAS AND ACCESS TO MACHINERY, AND REMOTE TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS WHICH TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE THE ALARM BETWEEN REMOTE LOCATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |