Drawing for CAT SCRATCH

USPTO serial 76663582

CAT SCRATCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAT SCRATCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tedd S. Levine

TEDD S LEVINE LEVINE & BALDINGER LLC1010 FRANKLIN AVE2ND FLGARDEN CITY, NY 11530

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture for CatsACTIVE
028Pet toys for cats, namely dangling scratch toysACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 24, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 24, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 5, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Sep 25, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 20, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 19, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 1, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance