USPTO serial 76664895
TALK ON WATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3696224Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 13, 2009
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TALK ON WATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OCEAN POWER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Pennington, NJ
OCEAN POWER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Pennington, NJ
OCEAN POWER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Pennington, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry I. Schanzer
29 BROOKFALL ROADEDISON, NJ 08817-2946UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electronic data transmission through the use of electronic equipment located on and within buoys distributed in bodies of water for receiving and transmitting electrical signals; Providing cellular telephone services through the use of electronic equipment located on and within buoys distributed in bodies of water for receiving and transmitting electrical signals; Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of electronic data in the field of sea navigation through the use of electronic equipment located on and within buoys distributed in bodies of water for receiving and transmitting electrical signals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 25, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OCEAN POWER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OCEAN POWER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OCEAN POWER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named TALK ON WATER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |