Drawing for EDUCAUSE LEARNING INITIATIVE

USPTO serial 76665867

EDUCAUSE LEARNING INITIATIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 622
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
Law office
UNKNOWN

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EDUCAUSE LEARNING INITIATIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sean M. McGinn

SEAN M MCGINN MCGINN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP8321 OLD COURTHOUSE RD STE 200VIENNA, VA 22182-3817UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable on-line publications, namely, brochures, newsletters and articles in the field of the use of information technology to improve learning in higher educationACTIVEMay 16, 2005
041Conducting on-line seminars and conducting on-line and in person conferences in the field of the use of information technology to improve learning in higher educationINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVEDMay 16, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2008PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED
Jan 3, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Sep 26, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 3, 2007PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED
Aug 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 22, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Sep 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance