USPTO serial 76668810
PATCH-LOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3690891Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 6, 2009
- Examiner
- LOTT, JASON E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PATCH-LOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Weston, Ontario, CA
Weston, Ontario, CA
Weston, Ontario, CA
WILMINGTON, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arne I. FORS
ARNE I FORS GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLPSTE 1600, 1 1ST CANADIAN PL100 KING ST WTORONTO, ON M5X 1G5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Rapid cure, high-strength, polymer based concrete patching compound for covering and securing steel pins | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Blok-Lok Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Blok-Lok Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Blok-Lok Limited
- Other trademarks owned by MITEK HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named PATCH-LOK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |