USPTO serial 76668900
FUCOYDON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 18, 2008
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FUCOYDON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Hill
Richard L. Hill Durham Jones & Pinegar, P.C.3301 North Thanksgiving Way, Suite 400Lehi, UT 84043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food beverages, namely, seaweed drinks, seaweed based drinks with fruit flavoring, preparations for making seaweed based drinks with fruit flavoring; dried and processed edible seaweed | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 30, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | โ |
| Nov 18, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | โ |
| Mar 29, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Dec 5, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | โ |
| Dec 5, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 5, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| Nov 17, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | โ |
| Oct 16, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Dec 18, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Oct 30, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Jun 26, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Nov 18, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | โ |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Mar 19, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Mar 19, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Mar 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Mar 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | โ |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | โ |
| Aug 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Aug 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Nov 24, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | โ |
| Nov 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |