CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for WORKSTATION

USPTO serial 76669125

WORKSTATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HINES, REGINA C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORKSTATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew D. Price

ANDREW D PRICE VENABLE LLPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded sound recordings featuring music; pre-recorded compact discs, audiotapes, audio digital tapes, and phonograph records featuring music; and downloadable musical sound recordingsACTIVE—
041Music production services; record production; audio recording and production; and music composition for others and music publishing servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 4, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 30, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 3, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2009IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2009INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
May 5, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 5, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 30, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 30, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 9, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 6, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance