Drawing for ISTUDIO

USPTO serial 76669361

ISTUDIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISTUDIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. Oppenhuizen

David L. Oppenhuizen The Weintraub Group, P.L.C.28580 Orchard Lake RoadSuite 140Farmington Hills, MI 48334

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROMOTION OF THE SOUND RECORDINGS OF OTHERS; PROMOTION OF MUSICAL PERFORMERS, ADVERTISING AGENCY SERVICES; ADVERTISING AGENCY SERVICES INCLUDING PREPARING AND ARRANGING FOR DISTRIBUTION OF ADVERTISEMENTSACTIVE
041OPERATING A MUSIC STUDIO FOR RECORDING ARTISTIC PERFORMANCES; OPERATING A PORTABLE STUDIO TO RECORD ARTISTIC PERFORMANCES, NAMELY, SINGING, RECITATION, MODELING, AND ACTING AT RETAIL SHOPPING CENTERS, AIRPORTS, AND UNIVERSITY CAMPUSES; CONDUCTING TALENT CONTESTS; COLLECTING AND JUDGING ARTISTIC PERFORMANCESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 11, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 11, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 19, 2011PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Apr 18, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Mar 28, 2011PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 31, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 22, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Jul 21, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jul 6, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 30, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jan 12, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 8, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 1, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 8, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 6, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 1, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 29, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 29, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jan 5, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 31, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 21, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 3, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 1, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 1, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 31, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 17, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 27, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 5, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Nov 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance