USPTO serial 76669361
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Oppenhuizen
David L. Oppenhuizen The Weintraub Group, P.L.C.28580 Orchard Lake RoadSuite 140Farmington Hills, MI 48334| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTION OF THE SOUND RECORDINGS OF OTHERS; PROMOTION OF MUSICAL PERFORMERS, ADVERTISING AGENCY SERVICES; ADVERTISING AGENCY SERVICES INCLUDING PREPARING AND ARRANGING FOR DISTRIBUTION OF ADVERTISEMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | OPERATING A MUSIC STUDIO FOR RECORDING ARTISTIC PERFORMANCES; OPERATING A PORTABLE STUDIO TO RECORD ARTISTIC PERFORMANCES, NAMELY, SINGING, RECITATION, MODELING, AND ACTING AT RETAIL SHOPPING CENTERS, AIRPORTS, AND UNIVERSITY CAMPUSES; CONDUCTING TALENT CONTESTS; COLLECTING AND JUDGING ARTISTIC PERFORMANCES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 1, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |