USPTO serial 76669476
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert O. Sailer
PO BOX 86REDMOND, WA 98073-0086UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Wine bottles | ACTIVE | May 15, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2008 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |