USPTO serial 76669608
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NEW YORK, NY
LNT Merchandising Company, LLC
Clifton, NJ
LNT Merchandising Company, LLC
Clifton, NJ
NEW YORK, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer S. Sickler
JENNIFER S. SICKLER GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1000 LOUISIANA STREET STE 3400HOUSTON, TX, 77002-5011UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Pillows, namely, decorative pillows, head supporting pillows, neck supporting pillows, nursing pillows, and maternity pillows; slipcovers, namely, fitted fabric covers for sofas, love seats, recliners, sectionals, ottomans, and chairs, fitted dining room chair covers; Shower curtain rings and shower rods; Interior window hardware, namely, interior window shades, interior window blinds, and interior window shutters; utensil wall racks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Cookware, namely, stock pots, soup pots, sauce pans, skillets, dutch ovens, steamers, roasting pans; bakeware, namely, baking dishes, baking sheets, baking pans, pie and pizza crispers, grid grill toppers, roast racks for supporting meat during cooking, baking stone, namely, a flat piece of crockery for cooking breads, bakery items, and meats, cooling rack for baked goods; dishes and dish covers thereof; wok, saucepan, double boiler; kitchen utensils, namely, whisks, ladles, spice mills, mixing bowls, colanders, scrapers for household purposes, spatulas, serving tongs, rolling pins, corkscrews, strainers, food basters, sewing spoons, condiment dishes, oven to table racks, carving and cutting boards, coasters not of paper and not being table linen, non-electric dough blenders, funnels, garlic presses, scoops for scooping ice cream and food; bottle openers, kitchen paper towel holders, pastry brushes, potato mashers, recipe boxes, salt and pepper mills and shakers, flour sifters, cooking skewers, spice racks, steamer baskets not of precious metal; dinnerware, namely, plates, cups, and saucers; napkin holders and napkin rings not of precious metal; cheese graters; non-electric pastry blenders | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Bath linens, namely, bath sheets and bath towels; shower curtain, shower liner, namely, a clot or fabric hanging used to reduce or prevent water from contacting a shower curtain; table linens, namely, table cloths not made of paper, table napkins not made of paper, table pad, namely, a table covering for preventing physical or moisture damage to an underlying table surface, cloth coasters, placemats not of paper; fabric window coverings and treatments, namely, curtains, draperies, sheers, panels, swags and valances; featherbed tops between the mattress and sheet; slipcovers, namely, unfitted fabric covers for sofas, love seats, recliners, sectionals, ottomans, and chairs; unfitted dining room chair covers; and unfitted covers for pillows and cushions; fitted covers for pillows and cushions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 027 | Rugs, bath rugs, woven rugs, bat mats, and rug pads, namely, floor mats in the nature of non-slip pads for use under rugs to prevent slippage | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |