USPTO serial 76669766
DWECK APPAREL GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DWECK APPAREL GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Sutton
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | UMBRELLAS ; KNAPSACKS, TOTE BAGS AND ALL-PURPOSE CARRYING BAGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | INTIMATE APPAREL, NAMELY, BRAS, PANTIES, THONGS; UNDERWEAR, CAMISOLES, T-SHIRTS, GLOVES, MITTENS, SCARVES, AND TANK TOPS; SLEEPWEAR, NAMELY, LADIES BOXER BRIEFS, BOXER SHORTS AND LONG JOHNS; HOSIERY, NAMELY, SOCKS; AND SLIPPERS--- | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |