USPTO serial 76669807
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New York, NY
Boca Raton, FL
BOCA RATON, FL
NEW YORK, NY
SEATTLE, WA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua M. Gerben, Esq.
Joshua M. Gerben, Esq. Gerben Law Firm, PLLC1050 Connecticut Ave NWSuite 500Washington, DC 20036| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing news and information services online via a global computer network of interest to grandparents, namely, information and website links relating to consumer products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 3, 2007 |
| 038 | Communications services, namely, providing electronic forums forming a worldwide online community which allows grandparents to interact with other grandparents and grandchildren; providing electronic forums for registered users to participate, get feedback from peers, form virtual communities, engage in social networking and improve their relationships with their grandchildren; bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning merchandise and services relevant to grandparents, reviews of merchandise and services relevant to grandparents | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 3, 2007 |
| 039 | Providing news and information services online via a global computer network of interests to grandparents, namely, information and web site links relating to travel | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 3, 2007 |
| 041 | Providing electronic magazines, newsletters, bulletins, guides, brochures and pamphlets in the fields of being a grandparent, raising grandchildren, traveling with grandchildren, activities appropriate for grandparents to do with grandchildren, consumer products and services of interest to grandparents, financial products relevant to grandparents, toys and other gifts for grandparents to purchase for their grandchildren, and games and other entertainment of interest to grandparents or their grandchildren, all via a worldwide computer network; providing e-mail newsletters in the fields of being a grandparent, raising grandchildren, traveling with grandchildren, activities appropriate for grandparents to do with grandchildren, consumer products and services of interest to grandparents, financial products relevant to grandparents, toys and other gifts for grandparents to purchase for their grandchildren, and games and other entertainment of interest to grandparents or their grandchildren, all via a worldwide computer network; providing news and information services online via a global computer network of interest to grandparents, namely, information and website links relating to leisure activities; publication of online journals, namely, blogs featuring publication of text, audio, video and graphic works featuring user-defined content, including diaries, commentary and photos | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 16, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 16, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 25, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 11, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |