USPTO serial 76669816
MAXFREIGHT INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3470026Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 2008
- Examiner
- BELZER, LYDIA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAXFREIGHT INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
INGLEWOOD, CA
INGLEWOOD, CA
INGLEWOOD, CA
MAXFREIGHT INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS
ROSEMEAD, CA
Other trademarks owned by MAXFREIGHT INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS
ROSEMEAD, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Freight forwarding service, warehousing services, namely, storage, distribution, and international and domestic pick up and delivery of consumer goods general dry cargo; international and domestic delivery of goods by trucks, aircrafts, and ocean vessels, air transportation, sea transportation in the nature of general containerized cargo ship transport and/or bulked freight ocean transport, land transportation in the nature of trailer trucks transport and van transport; aircraft and sea vessel chartering | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WONG, CECILIA WAI YIN
- Other trademarks owned by WONG, CECILIA WAI YIN
- Other trademarks owned by WONG, CECILIA WAI YIN
- Other trademarks owned by MAXFREIGHT INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS
- Other trademarks owned by LEE, NICHOLAS
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named MAXFREIGHT INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 22, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |