Drawing for HOUSEWORKS BY RYLAND

USPTO serial 76669933

HOUSEWORKS BY RYLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOUSEWORKS BY RYLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James T. Hosmer

JAMES T HOSMER NIXON & VANDERHYE PC901 N GLEBE RD FL 11ARLINGTON, VA 22203-1808UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, NAMELY, PLANNING, LAYING OUT AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESIDENTIAL HOMES BASED ON DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA THAT PROVIDES HIGHER ENERGY EFFICIENCIES AND IMPROVED ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL FEATURES TO SUCH HOMEACTIVE
042PROVIDING INFORMATION VIA THE INTERNET AND WORLD WIDE WEB REGARDING THE DESIGN OF NEW RESIDENTIAL HOMES, INCLUDING INFORMATION RELATING TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OPTIONS THAT PROVIDE HIGHER ENERGY EFFICIENCIES AND IMPROVED ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL FEATURES TO SUCH HOMES; AND PROVIDING ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTATION SERVICES TO NEW HOME BUYERS FEATURING INFORMATION REGARDING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OPTIONS THAT PROVIDE HIGHER ENERGY EFFICIENCIES AND IMPROVED ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL FEATURES TO SUCH HOMESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 18, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 9, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 8, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 8, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 18, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Oct 5, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Sep 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 21, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 13, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 16, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Dec 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance