USPTO serial 76669935
GLUTEN FREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLUTEN FREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dallas G. Thomsen
DALLAS G THOMSEN SUSSMAN SHANK LLP1000 SW BROADWAY STE 1400PORTLAND, OR 97205-3089UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Gluten free products, namely, unformed, formed and textured vegetable protein for use as a meat extender and meat substitute; soy protein for use as a food additive; soup mixes; dried eggs; milk powders; milk protein; whey; processed seeds; shelled seeds; potato flakes; and coated processed fruits | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2000 |
| 030 | Gluten free products, namely, food flavorings for soup mixes; flour; bran; processed herbs; spices; grits; bulgur; kasha; rice; tapioca; carob powder; wheat germ; gluten; flax seed meal; granola cereals; muffin mixes; mixes for bakery goods, namely, cakes; processed grain; biscuit mix; cookie mixes; pancake and waffle mixes; bread mixes; breakfast cereals; cornmeal; polenta; couscous; processed oats; sugar; starch; baking powder; baking soda; salt; cooking salt; popcorn and unpopped popcorn; yeast; rolled oats; rolled grains; and food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, ingredient or filler | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2000 |
| 031 | Gluten free products, namely, raw seeds; raw herbs; unprocessed grains; unprocessed millet; unprocessed oats and wheat | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |