USPTO serial 76669959
PRO.FILE PERFORMANCE SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3534454Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 18, 2008
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRO.FILE PERFORMANCE SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VIRGIL L. ROTH
625 FAIR OAKS AVESTE 255SOUTH PASADENA, CA 91030Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed forms featuring questionnaire and survey forms, reports and graphs for use in connection with personality testing, assessment, evaluation, training and hiring of employees, managers, and executives, and for use in connection with human resource management and consultation in the area of matching personnel with occupational requirements; Printed training manuals in the area of human resource management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2007 |
| 035 | On-line human resource assessment and development by way of provision to employers of an on-line questionnaire to identify the personality characteristics and behaviours necessary in different employment areas, On-line human resource assessment and development, namely, the selection, recruitment, promotion, coaching, evaluation, and training of employees, mangers and executives, by way of the provision to employers of an on-line survey to identify the personality characteristics and behaviours in employees and prospective employees so as to more accurately assess their potential for employment, On-line personnel management consultation in the area of matching personnel with occupational requirements, On-line business management consultation in the area of matching personnel with occupational requirements | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CONCORD CONSULTING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CONCORD CONSULTING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CONCORD CONSULTING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named PRO.FILE PERFORMANCE SYSTEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |