USPTO serial 76670011
LIFESTYLE NOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLZER, NATALIE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIFESTYLE NOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Long Branch, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ezra Sutton
EZRA SUTTON EZRA SUTTON PAPLZ 9, 900 ROUTE 9WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PLASTIC STORAGE BAGS FOR STORING FOOD | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 020 | PLASTIC STORAGE CONTAINERS FOR INDUSTRIAL OR COMMERCIAL USE | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 021 | HOUSEHOLD UTENSILS, NAMELY, STRAINERS, SPATULAS, GRATERS, SIEVES, SERVING SPOONS, AND KITCHEN LADLES; PLASTIC STORAGE CONTAINERS FOR DOMESTIC USE; PLASTIC BATHROOM ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, SOAP HOLDERS, SOAP DISPENSERS, TOOTH BRUSH HOLDERS, PLASTIC CUPS, TOILET TISSUE HOLDERS; PLASTIC DISHES, PLASTIC SCHOOL LUNCH BOXES, PET BOWLS, PLASTIC DRINKING CUPS WHICH SIMULATE GLASSWARE, PLASTIC CUTTING BOARDS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 024 | TEXTILE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, TEXTILE NAPKINS, TOWELS, BED SHEETS, DUVET COVERS, PILLOW CASES; SHOWER CURTAINS; PLASTIC TABLE CLOTHS; PLASTIC PLACE MATS | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | AREA RUGS; BATH MATS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 035 | ADVERTISING AND MARKETING HOUSEWARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, KITCHEN, BATH, LAUNDRY,CLEANING AND TOILETRY PRODUCTS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MIGLO HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named LIFESTYLE NOW
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |