USPTO serial 76670031
ANAHYM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLZER, NATALIE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANAHYM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan A. Raynes
EVAN A RAYNES FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telephone sets; videophones; facsimile machines; cellular phones; mobile telephones; apparatus and instruments for processing, reproducing, transmitting and recording sound or images, namely, radio-broadcasting receivers, television sets, video monitors, microphones, silicon microphones, loudspeakers, woofers, sub-woofers, headphones, earphones, audio/video amplifiers, recording players; recorders/players of optical discs; recorders/players of magnetic tapes; hard disc recorders; cameras; video cameras; video projectors; video screens; data processing equipment, namely, data processors and central processing units for processing data; personal computers and computer peripherals; electronic circuits for generating, effecting, recording and/or reproducing sound; electronic circuits for sequencing music; electronic circuits for mixing sound or music; handheld PCs; downloadable electronic music provided from a computer network; downloadable electronic music for signaling an incoming call of cellular phones; downloadable computer games software provided from a computer network; electronic integrated circuits; large scale integration chips; electronic microassemblies; semi-conductor devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |