USPTO serial 76670444
LUTREPATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUTREPATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
2132 JX Hoofddorp, NL
2132 JX Hoofddorp, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arne M. Olson
Arne M. Olson OLSON & CEPURITIS, LTD.20 North Wacker Drive36th FloorChicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS AND SUBSTANCES FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF INFERTILITY; IONTOPHORETIC DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE IN THE NATURE OF TRANSDERMAL PATCH SOLD WITH MEDICATION FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF INFERTILITY | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | MEDICAL DEVICE FOR ADMINISTERING PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS AND SUBSTANCES, NAMELY, IONTOPHORETIC DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE SOLD WITHOUT MEDICATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |