Drawing for THE LOGIC OF LENNAR

USPTO serial 76670868

THE LOGIC OF LENNAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LOGIC OF LENNAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LISA SHEREEN ZAMALUDIN

LISA SHEREEN ZAMALUDIN Slates Harwell, LLP1700 Pacific AvenueSuite 3800DALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036real estate listing services, real estate management, namely, the operation, brokerage and rental of mid and high rise condominiums properties for residential, business, and retail useACTIVE
037real estate development of mid and high rise buildings for residential, business and retail use, namely, construction consulting in the nature of site selection and construction planning, construction management and supervision; construction services, namely, planning, laying out and custom construction of mid and high-rise properties and maintenance of mid and high-rise condominium properties for residential, business and retail useACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 14, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Aug 12, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Aug 12, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Aug 12, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 29, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 29, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 18, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 17, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 12, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 24, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 24, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 17, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 12, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 16, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 15, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 15, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 19, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 17, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Sep 12, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 12, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 15, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 4, 2007CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED
May 4, 2007CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Apr 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 16, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance