USPTO serial 76671174
MI-PARK.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWER, MARGARET
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MI-PARK.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter S. Sloane
PETER S. SLOANE OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN, LLP1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic display messaging units for showing parking c:credits for cars and vehicles; computer keypads; barcode scanners; electronic and magnetic ID cards for use in connection with payment and for car and vehicle parking services; encoding electronic chip cards and smart cards containing programming used to pay parking meters for cars and vehicles; meters for parking; electronic payment terminals | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | business consulting services relating to payment and collection processing systems for car and vehicle parking and transit; consultation services in the field of traffic management; operation of a business for others, namely, car parks and on-street and off street parking facilities | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | electronic toll collection services; electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of payment data for car and vehicle parking | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | provision of car parking systems and facilities, namely, car parking, parking garage services, parking space reservation services, rental of car parking spaces; car parking services; parking garages services; parking lot services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | provision and operation of automated parking facilities and systems provision and operation of car parking fee collection systems, namely, for the collection of fees and tolls in the operation of car parking facilities and in the provision of on-street and off-street parking and the rental of car parking spaces and in the collection of tolls in the operation of toll roads and toll bridges | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MuniPay Holdings Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MI-PARK.COM
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |