CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for GOODGRO

USPTO serial 76671425

GOODGRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 602
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GOODGRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

A. YATES DOWELL, III

A. YATES DOWELL, III Dowell & Dowell, P.C.103 Oronoco St.Suite 220Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001HORTICULTURAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, PLANTING SOIL IN THE NATURE OF BLACK EARTH, POTTING SOIL, SYNTHETIC SOIL, SPECIALIZED GROWING MEDIA BLENDS FOR PLANTS, PLUGS AND SEEDS, PEAT HUMUS, COMPOSTED MANURE, SHRIMP COMPOST, FORESTRY COMPOST, SEA COMPOST, SOIL CONDITIONER, ORGANIC FERTILIZER, PERLITE, VERMICULITE, GRANULAR LIME FOR HORTICULTURAL USE, CHARCOAL FOR HORTICULTURAL PURPOSESACTIVE—
031HORTICULTURAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, GARDENING TOP SOIL, SPHAGNUM PEAT MOSS, CEDAR AND HEMLOCK MULCH, PINE BARK NUGGETS, COCOA SHELL MULCHACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 20, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 20, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 9, 2010CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 8, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 1, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 28, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 28, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 27, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2009CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 20, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 29, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 29, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 29, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 17, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2008CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 14, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 5, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 12, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 12, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 11, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2007AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 8, 2007FFDMFILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 24, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance