USPTO serial 76671487
SOPHISTACHICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOPHISTACHICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lawrenceville, GA
Lawrenceville, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. McKee
804 SWAPS LNKNOXVILLE, TN 37923-2139UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | production of television and radio programs; distribution of television and radio programs for others; production and publishing of music in the form of albums, tapes and discs containing recorded music; fan clubs; development and dissemination of educational materials of others in the field of music and entertainment; production of radio entertainment, audio and sound recording and production; record production; videotape production; production of motion picture films; distribution of motion picture films; television program syndication; entertainment in the nature of ongoing television programs in the field of music and entertainment; entertainment, namely, a music and entertainment show distributed over television, satellite, radio, and the Internet; publication of books and magazines; entertainment in the nature of ongoing radio programs; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site whose subject matter relates to music and musical entertainment; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line reviews of music, artists and music videos; entertainment services, namely, providing prerecorded music, and commentary and articles about music, all on-line via a global computer network; publishing of web magazines; entertainment services, namely, providing interactive games that may be accessed by means of a global computer network; providing on-line journals, namely, blogs featuring entertainment topics; and providing television programs in the fields of music and entertainment via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 28, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |