USPTO serial 76671725
SEEING RED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEEING RED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stoney Creek, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher H. Kozlowski
CHRISTOPHER H. KOZLOWSKI KOZLOWSKI & COMPANY5065 Forest Hill DriveMississauga, Ontario, L5M 5A7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Musical sound recordings; musical video recordings; audio and audio visual recordings comprising music, namely, CDs, DVD's, CD-ROMs, MP3s, cassette tapes, records and laser disks; downloadable music sound recordings, downloadable musical video recordings | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, hats, cap, visors, head bands, hoods, scarves, neck ties, mufflers, shirts, T-shirts, blouses, pull overs tops, jackets, parkas, coats, sweaters, vests, sweat shirts, pants, sweat pants, shorts, bottoms, skirts, dresses, underwear, swim wear, beach wear, leotards, leggings, tights, pajamas, robes, lounge wear, belts | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of live performances by a musical band | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |