USPTO serial 76672047
Serial No. 76672047
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 76672047?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth Watov
KENNETH WATOV WATOV & KIPNES, P.C.PO BOX 247PRINCETON JUNCTION, NJ 08550-0247UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, footwear, and headgear, namely, shirts, hats, T-shirts, sweatshirts, coats, neckties, pants, shorts, caps, shoes, sneakers, loafers, sandals, jackets, socks, pajamas, anklets, gloves, foul weather gear, headwear, kerchiefs, vests, sweaters, nightwear, ponchos, sleeping garments, slippers, sun visors, and earmuffs; sports apparel, namely, athletic uniforms, jerseys, anti-perspirant socks, bathing suits, belts, bicycling gloves, coats, shirts, bras, jackets, over-uniforms, and breeches; and costumes, namely, Halloween costumes, dance costumes, and masquerade costumes; and waterproof apparel, namely, jackets, pants, coats, shirts, vests, gloves, ponchos, wetsuits, and capes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2009 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PBMR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |