Drawing for INDIAN GAMING TODAY

USPTO serial 76672135

INDIAN GAMING TODAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INDIAN GAMING TODAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David R. Fairbairn

DAVID R. FAIRBAIRN KINNEY & LANGE, P.A.THE KINNEY & LANGE BUILDING312 SOUTH THIRD STREETMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF LEGAL AND POLITICAL ISSUES RELATING TO THE GAMING INDUSTRYABANDONEDMay 25, 2006
045LEGAL CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF LEGAL AND POLITICAL ISSUES RELATING TO THE GAMING INDUSTRYABANDONEDMay 25, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Jul 2, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jul 2, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jul 2, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Apr 1, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jul 14, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Apr 9, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Mar 11, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 4, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 31, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 30, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 25, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 7, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 6, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 4, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 4, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 21, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 13, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Feb 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance