USPTO serial 76672145
IGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ezra Sutton
EZRA SUTTON EZRA SUTTON, P. A.PLAZA 9, 900 ROUTE 9WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | MILK; YOGURT DRINKS; MILK BEVERAGES MAINLY MADE OF MILK; MILK BEVERAGES COMPRISING FRUIT; FERMENTED PLAIN OR FLAVORED MILK PRODUCTS, NAMELY, MILK BEVERAGES WITH HIGH MILK CONTENT, MILK BEVERAGES CONTAINING FRUITS, MILK BEVERAGES CONTAINING FRUIT JUICES; MILK PREPARATIONS FOR COFFEE; SOY BASED MILK BEVERAGES USED AS A MILK SUBSTITUTE FOR SAME | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | COFFEE; TEA; ARTIFICIAL COFFEE; EDIBLE ICES; CHOCOLATE BASED BEVERAGES BEING NON-DAIRY BASED OR VEGETABLE BASED; MILK CHOCOLATE, COCOA BEVERAGES WITH MILK, COCOA MIXES, HOT CHOCOLATE, COFFEE BASED BEVERAGES CONTAINING MILK, BEVERAGES MADE OF COFFEE, ESPRESSO; FROZEN FLAVORED WATERS, ICE CREAM DRINKS, ICE MILK; FLAVORING FOR BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | MINERAL AND AERATED WATERS; SPARKLING WATER; DRINKING WATER; NON-ALCOHOLIC SPORTS DRINKS AND POWDER FOR MAKING THE SAME; NON-ALCOHOLIC AND NON-CARBONATED FRUIT-FLAVORED DRINKS; FRUIT JUICE AND FRUIT JUICE DRINKS; FRUIT-FLAVORED CARBONATED OR NON-CARBONATED DRINKING WATER; SOFT DRINKS AND SYRUPS AND CONCENTRATES FOR MAKING THE SAME; SMOOTHIES; FROZEN FRUIT-BASED BEVERAGES; AERATED FRUIT JUICES; FRUIT JUICE CONCENTRATES; FRUIT NECTARS; COFFEE-FLAVORED SOFT DRINKS; FLAVORED WATER; ENERGY DRINKS; HERBAL JUICES; ISOTONIC DRINKS; AND NON-ALCOHOLIC COCKTAIL MIXES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by iGO WATER CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by iGO WATER CO., INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named IGO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |