CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for FRESH FLUSH

USPTO serial 76672189

FRESH FLUSH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH FLUSH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John D. Gugliotta

John D. Gugliotta Patent, Copyright & Trademark Law Group, LLCPO Box 506Richfield, OH 44286UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Air freshening preparations for use in battery-operated air freshening units which are activated by a decrease in water level caused by flushing of a toiletACTIVE—
011Battery-operated dispensing units for air fresheners which are activated by a decrease in water level caused by flushing of a toiletACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 10, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 2, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 13, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 27, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 13, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 12, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 13, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 12, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 12, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 25, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 9, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance