USPTO serial 76672397
WONDERPEDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4196223Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 28, 2012
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WONDERPEDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA, CA
HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA, CA
HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA, CA
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 2H7, XP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq. Kenyon & Kenyon LLPOne BroadwayNew York, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, the provision of information resources in the field of education for children and parents, via the global computer network, wireless networks or interactive television | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DHX MEDIA LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by DHX MEDIA LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by DHX MEDIA LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by HALIFAX FILM LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WONDERPEDIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 11, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |