USPTO serial 76672528
STAR BRIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STAR BRIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Talivaldis Cepuritis
TALIVALDIS CEPURITIS OLSON & HIERL, LTD.36TH FL20 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | KNIVES, WEDDING CAKE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, CAKE KNIVES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | FAVORS, NAMELY, PAPER PARTY FAVORS, WEDDING ALBUMS, GUEST BOOKS, PENS, AND PAPER CAKE DECORATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | PILLOWS, PICTURE FRAMES, AND PLASTIC CAKE DECORATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | DRINKING GLASSES, TABLE PLACE CARD HOLDERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, NAPKIN RINGS, CAKE SERVERS, CAKE STANDS, AND CAKE SERVER SETS | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | HAIR ORNAMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hosley International Trading Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Hosley International Trading Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named STAR BRIGHT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 12, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |