CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PINKISH

USPTO serial 76672725

PINKISH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PINKISH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin P. Michael

MARTIN P. MICHAEL Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLPP.O. Box 061080Wacker Drive Station - Sears TowerChicago, IL 60606-1080

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018tote bags and hand bagsACTIVE—
025women's and girls' pajamas, hooded shirts and sweatshirts, hooded sweatshirts, zip hooded sweatshirts and jackets; pants, shorts, capris, T-shirts, tank tops, sleep shirts, slippers, socks, flip flops; track pants, track jackets, track suits, gym shorts, sweat shorts; lounge wear, pj pants, scrub pants, robes, tunics; night shirts, dorm shirts, dorm shorts, yoga shirts, yoga pants, yoga jackets, tights, jogging outfits, jogging pants, jogging suits, body suits, capri pants, warm up suits, jumpsuits, stretch pants, jackets, pullovers, leggings, sweatpants; and glovesACTIVE—
028stuffed toy animalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 27, 2009TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Apr 27, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 27, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 30, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 5, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 2, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 22, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 22, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 22, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 22, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 22, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance