CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for GOD IS HUMAN RIGHTS. DIEU, C'EST LES DROITS DE L'HOMME. DIOS ES DERECHOS HUMANOS.

USPTO serial 76672756

GOD IS HUMAN RIGHTS. DIEU, C'EST LES DROITS DE L'HOMME. DIOS ES DERECHOS HUMANOS.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOD IS HUMAN RIGHTS. DIEU, C'EST LES DROITS DE L'HOMME. DIOS ES DERECHOS HUMANOS.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen B. Tripp

Karen B. Tripp Karen B. Tripp, Attorney at LawPO BOX 1301HOUSTON, TX 77251-1301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016A series of educational and literary books and written articles in the field of human rights, namely, human rights in FranceACTIVE—
041Online journals, namely, blogs in the field of human rights, namely, human rights in FranceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 15, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 20, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 10, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 8, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 20, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 28, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 27, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 20, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 5, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 20, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 20, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 20, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 26, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 24, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 22, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance