USPTO serial 76672960
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Cyril Malloy, III
JOHN CYRIL MALLOY, III MALLOY & MALLOY, P.A.2800 SW 3RD AVEMIAMI, FL 33129-2317UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting events for concerts, conferences, trade shows, car shows, and motorcycle shows; conducting and arranging trade shows in the field of automobiles and motorcycles | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2005 |
| 043 | Hotel and restaurant services; arena services, namely, providing facilities for concerts, conventions and exhibitions; providing conference facilities | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |