USPTO serial 76673085
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harold V. Stotland
HAROLD V. STOTLAND SEYFARTH SHAW LLP131 SOUTH DEARBORN STREETSUITE 2400CHICAGO, IL 60603-5577| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | APPARATUS, INSTALLATIONS AND SYSTEMS FOR WATER COLLECTION SUPPLY AND SANITARY PURPOSES, AND FOR THE SEPARATION OF SOLIDS AND PARTICULATES FROM WATER, SEWAGE AND INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT AND FOR THE MANAGEMENT, FLOW, SEPARATION. SCREENING, STORAGE AND TREATMENT OF WATER COMPRISING FILTERS, WATER PUMPS, FLOW REGULATORS, FLOW CONTROL REGULATORS, SCREENS AND SCREEN PLATES, BRUSHES, VALVES, VORTEX VALVES, BACK PLATES, PIPES AND DUCTING, STORAGE TANKS; DRAINAGE AND SOAK AWAY SYSTEMS AND INSTALLATIONS, COMPRISED OF PLASTIC MATRIX BLOCKS USED TO CONSTRUCT AND GIVE ACCESS TO SOAK AWAYS AND INFILTRATION SYSTEMS; WATER ATTENUATION APPARATUS AND INSTALLATIONS, NAMELY, SURFACE WATER INFILTRATION AND SOAK AWAY SYSTEMS COMPRISING FILTERS, PLASTIC MATRIX BLOCKS USED TO CONSTRUCT AND GIVE ACCESS TO SOAK AWAYS AND INFILTRATION SYSTEMS, AND GRAVEL PITS; REPLACEMENT PART AND FITTINGS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |