USPTO serial 76673137
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN J. COYNE
BRIAN J. COYNE MILES WAY COYNE, PLLC924 CAPITOL WAY SOUTHOLYMPIA, WA 98501UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Commercial cleaning services, namely, commercial janitorial and custodial services; cleaning services for commercial office interiors and exteriors; carpet and rug cleaning services; furniture cleaning services; drapery cleaning services; upholstery cleaning services; window cleaning services; emergency cleaning services, namely, water and fire damage; pressure washing services; motor vehicle fleet washing services; commercial office floor stripping and refinishing services; odor control services; commercial parking lot cleaning services, janitorial services, namely, garbage removal services for commercial offices; plumbing cleaning services, namely, pipe cleaning services in commercial offices and in industrial facilities; residential cleaning services for residential sales and rentals; consulting services in the field of commercial cleaning services, namely, commercial janitorial and custodial services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |