Drawing for CLEANSTART

USPTO serial 76673137

CLEANSTART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEANSTART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRIAN J. COYNE

BRIAN J. COYNE MILES WAY COYNE, PLLC924 CAPITOL WAY SOUTHOLYMPIA, WA 98501UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Commercial cleaning services, namely, commercial janitorial and custodial services; cleaning services for commercial office interiors and exteriors; carpet and rug cleaning services; furniture cleaning services; drapery cleaning services; upholstery cleaning services; window cleaning services; emergency cleaning services, namely, water and fire damage; pressure washing services; motor vehicle fleet washing services; commercial office floor stripping and refinishing services; odor control services; commercial parking lot cleaning services, janitorial services, namely, garbage removal services for commercial offices; plumbing cleaning services, namely, pipe cleaning services in commercial offices and in industrial facilities; residential cleaning services for residential sales and rentals; consulting services in the field of commercial cleaning services, namely, commercial janitorial and custodial servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 25, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jan 25, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 11, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 5, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 5, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 4, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 4, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 2, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 2, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 1, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 1, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 5, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 9, 2007CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED
Oct 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 5, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 5, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 5, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 27, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 5, 2007ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 22, 2007UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 21, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2007ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 1, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 16, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 6, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 2, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance