USPTO serial 76673151
INVENT! INVENT! INVENT! PATENT IT!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INVENT! INVENT! INVENT! PATENT IT!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | intellectual property consultation | ACTIVE | Dec 19, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |