USPTO serial 76673169
THE LOGIC OF LENNAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE LOGIC OF LENNAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISA SHEREEN ZAMALUDIN
LISA SHEREEN ZAMALUDIN Slates Harwell, LLP1700 Pacific AvenueSuite 3800DALLAS, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | consultation in the fields of real estate management and real estate brokering; real estate management and real estate brokerage services of residential communities, undeveloped properties and individual residences; financial services, namely, mortgage banking, mortgage brokerage, and title insurance agency services; insurance underwriting in the nature of title insurance, and insurance agency services | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | real estate development and planning services, namely, developing, laying out and constructing residential communities and individual residences | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named THE LOGIC OF LENNAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2007 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |