USPTO serial 76673206
FOOD PARTNERS OF LINCOLN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3514390Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 7, 2008
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FOOD PARTNERS OF LINCOLN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce A McDonald
BRUCE A MCDONALD SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP2001 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWSTE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1825Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale distribution and delivery of food and beverages, cleaning products, kitchen equipment, tableware, and dining room finishings to customers in the institutional foodservice market, namely, restaurants, hotels, schools, supermarket delis, and institutions, including health care facilities, hospitals, nursing homes, prisons, summer camps and universities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 22, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |