USPTO serial 76673331
BRIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAN, AMY C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip M. Weiss
PHILIP M. WEISS WEISS & WEISS300 OLD COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 251MINEOLA, NY 11501-4149UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Oral cosmetic and oral hygiene products, namely, toothpastes, breath freshener sprays, tooth whitening preparations, preparations for maintaining white teeth, namely, tooth whitening gels, pastes and creams, tooth whitening gels, tooth whitening pastes, lip balm, lip stick, non-medicated lip care preparations, non-medicated lip treatments and mouthwash | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Medicated dental floss; medicated lip balm; antibacterial or decongestant sprays | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Non-medicated dental floss | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jablow, Jennifer
- Other trademarks owned by Jablow, Jennifer
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named BRIGHT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2009 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |