USPTO serial 76673611
ABREEZO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ABREEZO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID S. WELSH
DAVID S. WELSH TREVOY LLP680 Manulife Place10180-101 st.EDMONTON, Alberta, T5J 3S4Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Heating, ventilating and air conditioning products, namely ventilation fans, heating fans, cooling fans, heat pumps, furnaces, permanently-installed humidifiers, permanently-installed air conditioning systems, gas and electric water heaters, permanently-installed water purification systems, in-floor heating systems, furnace air filters; Household appliances, namely water filters for refrigerators, water filters for faucets and taps, water filters for water containers, dispensing units for air fresheners, portable cooling fans, portable humidifiers, portable heating fans, portable air conditioners, portable air filtering units | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |