USPTO serial 76673788
STEPHEN DWECK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STEPHEN DWECK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ezra Sutton
EZRA SUTTON Ezra Sutton, P.A.PLAZA 9 BLDG., 900 U.S. HWY. 9WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | FLATWARE, NAMELY, FORKS, KNIVES, SPOONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | BEDDING, NAMELY, PILLOWCASES, SHAMS, BED BLANKETS, BED SPREADS, QUILTS, BED SKIRTS, DUST RUFFLES, DUVET COVERS, AND BLANKET THROWS; SHOWER CURTAINS; POT HOLDERS; OVEN MITTS; PLACE MATS NOT OF PAPER; CLOTH NAPKINS FOR THE KITCHEN; FABRIC TABLE RUNNERS; TABLE CLOTHS NOT OF PAPER; BATH TOWELS; HAND TOWELS; KITCHEN TOWELS; TEA TOWELS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DWECK INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DWECK INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named STEPHEN DWECK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |