Drawing for ECO BOOT CAMP

USPTO serial 76674078

ECO BOOT CAMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECO BOOT CAMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas M. Parry

THOMAS M. PARRY Marzouk & Parry1120 Nineteenth Street, N.W.Suite 750Washington, DC 20036-3605

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, conducting courses, seminars and workshops in the field of environmentally and economically sustainable practices applied to the business and personal context; training services;in the field of environmentally and economically sustainable practices applied to the business and personal contextACTIVEMar 1, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2009PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Dec 11, 2008PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Dec 9, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Nov 26, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Nov 26, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 23, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 23, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 11, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 8, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 6, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 24, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance