Drawing for ISERVE DBA

USPTO serial 76674218

ISERVE DBA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISERVE DBA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael P. Adams

MICHAEL P. ADAMS Winstead Sechrest & Minick P.C.P.O. Box 50784Dallas, TX 75201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing services to assist third parties in maintaining their databases and managing their IMS environments in the form of technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 22, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 22, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 7, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 8, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 7, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 8, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 19, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 19, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 6, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 6, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 6, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 5, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2008PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance