USPTO serial 76674218
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael P. Adams
MICHAEL P. ADAMS Winstead Sechrest & Minick P.C.P.O. Box 50784Dallas, TX 75201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing services to assist third parties in maintaining their databases and managing their IMS environments in the form of technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |