USPTO serial 76674485
IT REALLY WORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, JANET H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IT REALLY WORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Cislo
Daniel M. Cislo Cislo & Thomas LLP1333 2nd Street Suite 500Santa Monica, CA 90401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | TV and film production for others to make infomercials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 21, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 21, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |