USPTO serial 76674699
FIRST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIRST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Aurora, Ontario L4G 7K1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey T. Imai
JEFFREY T. IMAI Magna International Inc.337 Magna DriveAurora Ontario, L4G 7K1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | design of vehicles, automotive parts, automotive components, automotive modules and automotive assemblies, namely, for automotive original equipment manufacturers; engineering in the field of vehicles, automotive parts, automotive components, automotive modules and automotive assemblies, namely, for automotive original equipment manufacturers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2007 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |