USPTO serial 76675053
HUNGRY PLANET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HUNGRY PLANET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Chapman
JAMES C. CHAPMAN NIXON PEABODY LLP2225 E BAYSHORE RDSTE 200PALO ALTO, CA 94303-3220Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee; coffee beans; tea; cocoa; prepared coffee and coffee-based beverages; prepared espresso and espresso-based beverages; beverages made of tea; powdered chocolate and vanilla; flavoring syrups to add to beverages; baked goods, namely, pies, cookies, pastries, cakes, tarts, strudels, brownies, cup cakes, breads, rolls, muffins, croissants, baguettes, donuts, and bagels; ice tea; powdered iced tea mix; chocolate food beverages, not being dairy-based or vegetable-based; cocoa products, namely, liquid and powdered hot chocolate mixes | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | services for providing food and drink, namely, catering for foods and drink; restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Shield Foundation
- Other trademarks owned by The Shield Foundation
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named HUNGRY PLANET
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |