USPTO serial 76675065
AESC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AESC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa-ken, JP
Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa-ken, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rhea Caras
Rhea Caras Lamb & Kawakami LLP333 South Grand AvenueSuite 4200Los Angeles, CA 90071-1546Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Batteries, lithium ion batteries, electric batteries, rechargeable accumulator batteries, wet cell batteries, dry cell batteries, photovoltaic solar batteries, batteries for vehicles, lithium ion batteries for vehicles, electric batteries for vehicles, batteries for lighting, batteries for pocket lamps, battery boxes, battery chargers, battery jars | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Automobiles, wagons, trucks, vehicle vans, sport utility vehicles, buses, recreational vehicles, sports cars, racing cars, light lorries, fork lift trucks, electric vehicles, fuel cell vehicles, hybrid vehicles, towing tractors, two-wheeled motor vehicles, two-wheeled electric motor vehicles, two-wheeled fuel cell motor vehicles; bicycles and bicycle parts, namely, bicycle wheels, sprockets and handle bar ends; carts; car towing vehicles for pushing and pulling cars; tractors; motors and engines for land vehicles; traction engines, hybrid engines for vehicles; alternating current motors/direct current motors for land vehicles; land vehicle parts, namely, axles, brakes, shock absorbers and power transmissions; anti-theft alarms for vehicles; adhesive rubber patches for repairing tubes or tires | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair, maintenance, and installation of batteries, lithium ion batteries, battery boxes, battery chargers, battery jars, motors, automobiles and their parts, electric vehicles, fuel cell vehicles, hybrid vehicles, two-wheeled motor vehicles; recharging batteries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named AESC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |