USPTO serial 76675353
INERGY MIND SPA CENTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3710758Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 17, 2009
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INERGY MIND SPA CENTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kamloops, British Columbia, CA
Kamloops, British Columbia, CA
Kamloops, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. S. VAN LANDINGHAM, III
91 Lakemaster LaneLake Havasu City, AZ 86403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Bodywork therapy featuring induced light and sound therapy; health care services, namely, wellness programs featuring neuro linguistic programming techniques, hypnosis and hypnotherapy as methods for achieving personal, career and/or life improvement; medical consultation on behavioral issues, addictions, pain management, weight management, stress management, smoke cessation and sleeplessness | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SAGE SUPPORT SERVICES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SAGE SUPPORT SERVICES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SAGE SUPPORT SERVICES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named INERGY MIND SPA CENTERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |