USPTO serial 76675458
ENLIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4042243Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 18, 2011
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ENLIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sacramento, CA
Sacramento, CA
Sacramento, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark C. Jacobs
MARK C. JACOBS LAW OFFICE OF MARK C. JACOBS3033 EL CAMINO AVENUESACRAMENTO, CA 95821-6014UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, JACKETS, BLOUSES, PANTS, SHORTS, TRAVEL SHOES; UV LIGHT PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FOR ADULTS AND CHILDREN, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, PANTS, SHORTS, JACKETS, COATS, SCARVES, VESTS, GLOVES, SPORT VESTS, AND FOOTWEAR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 6, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2009 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |